Something strange happens when you ask the Australian Government one of the simplest questions in gaming right now: what is Grand Theft Auto VI rated in Australia?
Instead of one answer, you can find several.
G. PG. M.
Search a little deeper and things get considerably weirder. One GTA VI listing is attributed to a production company called “sasavot.” Another lengthy variation of the name belongs to “shakirashakira.” A newer GTA 6 A listing carries a PG rating and names its production company as “1v1-1v1.”
Rockstar Games is nowhere to be found.
For a few seconds, it is genuinely funny.
Grand Theft Auto VI — the follow-up to a game filled with drugs, murder, strip clubs, torture, carjackings and enough profanity to make a sailor ask everyone to settle down — apparently suitable for the whole family.
Except it isn’t.
POPTOPIC examined a growing collection of these GTA 6 Australian classification records and found no sign that the strange G, PG and M entries belong to Rockstar Games’ release. The Australian PlayStation page for GTA VI, meanwhile, says the game’s age ratings remain unconfirmed.
So how are games apparently calling themselves GTA VI ending up inside an official Australian Government database?
That is where things get interesting.
GTA VI has a copycat problem — and the system is exposing it
When most Australians see something listed on the National Classification Database, there is an understandable assumption behind it.
The government has rated this thing.
Normally, that is all anyone needs to know. Look up a film and you will find its rating. Search a game and you will see whether it is G, PG, M, MA15+ or R18+. Parents use it. Retailers rely on it. Journalists use it to confirm upcoming releases.
It carries the weight of an official record.
Games, however, have changed enormously since every major release arrived in a box and somebody physically submitted it for assessment. Thousands of games, apps and small digital experiences now pour into online storefronts. Australia uses the International Age Rating Coalition’s Global Rating Tool, better known as IARC, to handle many of them.
The process is far more automated than most players would probably expect.
Australia’s own guide to the IARC tool says developers complete a questionnaire while setting up a game on a participating storefront. The tool generates a rating and consumer advice. When that storefront listing is active and its publication date has arrived, the classification is automatically published to the National Classification Database.
There is not necessarily a room full of Australian classifiers looking at something called GTA VI🌴GRAND THEFT AUTO VI GTA6🌴iii and wondering why Rockstar suddenly changed its company name to shakirashakira.
The machine is doing what it was designed to do.
A developer gives the storefront a game. The developer completes the questionnaire. IARC generates the classification. The active listing flows through to Australia’s database.
And suddenly something carrying the words Grand Theft Auto VI can sit on an Australian Government website with a big green G beside it.
The GTA VI ratings we found
The clearest example was classified on August 5, 2026. It is simply called GTA VI and rated G for very mild violence, in-game purchases, online interactivity and chat. Its developer and publisher fields are blank. Its production company is listed as sasavot.
A July 26 record uses GTA VI, Grand Theft Auto VI and GTA6 in the same title. It is also rated G, with shakirashakira named as the production company. Another comes from code10. Other records use names including ultra9, jomangy, moistii and leva2k. The PG-rated GTA 6 A record was classified on August 30 with 1v1-1v1 as its production company.
None of those names is Rockstar Games or Take-Two Interactive.
Welcome to the glamorous world of Australian video-game classification in 2026.
This is not the first time a database entry has created confusion around a major game. Australia recently had to untangle conflicting classifications for Halloween: The Game, while the game’s eventual refusal also showed how quickly an administrative record can become a national gaming story.
No, these records do not rate Rockstar’s GTA VI
Before anyone cancels the babysitter and plans GTA night with the kids, there is some good news.
An unrelated game’s classification cannot become Rockstar’s classification because somebody gave it a similar name.
Australian Classification explains that a computer-game decision can be used across formats only when it is the same game: the version must be identical to the classified version or contain only modifications that are exempt from classification. A matching title is not enough.
There is no evidence that these odd database entries can delay Rockstar’s release, change its content, block its Australian launch or decide the rating it eventually receives. They appear to be separate digital games or experiences using a famous name.
The problem is information.
If you search an official government database and find “GTA VI — G,” it looks convincing. Strip away the IARC mechanics and obscure production-company fields and you are left with something that fits very neatly into a headline:
GTA VI Rated G in Australia.
It would also be perfect material for a search engine, automated scraper or AI answer to misunderstand if it considered only the title, rating and authority of the source.
That is how bad information gets legs. Somebody finds an official-looking entry. Somebody else reports it. Another site rewrites that report. Social media grabs it. Eventually everyone is citing everyone else while the original record belonged to a different product.
With perhaps the most anticipated game release in history approaching, this is no longer an obscure database curiosity. Australians are already planning their launch night around the local release window, including the fact that New Zealand is set to begin playing several hours earlier.
The cleanest answer is also the least exciting one: Rockstar’s Grand Theft Auto VI does not yet have a confirmed Australian age rating that POPTOPIC can identify.
PlayStation Australia says exactly that.
The real GTA VI rating could still become an Australian story
Ironically, while the G-rated lookalikes are attracting attention, Australia’s rules have changed in a way that could make the real GTA 6 Australian rating genuinely interesting.
Grand Theft Auto V was classified R18+ in 2013, originally with consumer advice for drug use. Modified versions remained R18+, and Grand Theft Auto V Enhanced carries advice for high-impact themes, drug use, violence, sex and online interactivity.
Australia then changed the rules for gambling-like content in games from September 22, 2024.
Under the current system, games with paid chance-based purchases such as loot boxes receive at least an M classification. More relevant to GTA, games containing simulated gambling, including playable casino-style gambling, must be classified R18+.
The official guidance also draws a useful line: a casino setting or gambling imagery alone is not necessarily captured. The player has to be able to engage with gambling activity that meets the definition.
That does not mean GTA VI has already been rated R18+. We do not yet know whether it includes casino gameplay that meets Australia’s test. A casino building sitting in Vice City would not settle it.
But if Rockstar lets players actively participate in qualifying casino-style gambling, the mandatory Australian rules point to an R18+ outcome for that element.
Considering the previous game was already restricted to adults, Rockstar may hardly lose sleep over it. Australian players have a separate practical concern, however: new age-assurance measures for restricted online games have already raised questions about privacy and access.
Could GTA VI face an Australian ratings scare?
Probably — but not because somebody managed to get a G-rated product called GTA VI into the database.
Grand Theft Auto has history with Australia’s classification system because Rockstar’s games live comfortably at the adult end of it. Drugs, sex, violence and high-impact themes all appear in official consumer advice for versions of GTA V.
An adult rating for GTA VI would therefore be unsurprising. The news would be why it received that rating, or whether a particular mechanic collided with Australian rules.
R18+ is not a ban. Adults can buy and play R18+ games in Australia.
A real problem would emerge only if content exceeded what the R18+ category permits and the game received Refused Classification, or if Rockstar changed material specifically for Australia. There is currently no evidence either is happening.
That matters before screenshots of these G and PG records start bouncing around social media beside theories that Rockstar has censored the game, Australia has banned it or the Classification Board has gone completely mad.
The same caution applies to supposed gameplay revelations. Our recent examination of GTA VI’s reported Criminal Profile system found an intriguing rumour that still required careful limits around what had actually been confirmed.
Sometimes a G rating is not a conspiracy.
Sometimes it is just a game called GTA VI that is not actually that GTA VI.
Australia’s GTA VI listings expose a bigger problem
There is a certain irony here.
IARC exists because modern digital storefronts made the old way of individually handling every release impractical. Australia needs a system capable of classifying enormous numbers of games without turning every mobile app and online experience into a government paperwork exercise.
For the most part, that makes sense.
GTA VI shows how strange it can look from the outside. The National Classification Database contains records using one of gaming’s most recognisable names, complete with official Australian ratings, while the actual game everyone is searching for remains unconfirmed.
The database is not necessarily wrong about the products it has classified. The naming is the problem.
Unless a reader knows what IARC is, checks the production company, understands how automated decisions reach the database and cross-checks Rockstar or PlayStation, there is little warning that “GTA VI rated G” does not mean Grand Theft Auto VI is rated G.
For one of the world’s biggest releases, that is an information trap waiting to be stepped on. It is also another reason to treat viral GTA VI claims carefully; POPTOPIC recently traced a convincing Lucia image back to an AI-generated fake, and the same hunger for certainty can make database oddities travel just as quickly.
POPTOPIC has contacted the Australian Classification Branch seeking clarification on the GTA VI-labelled IARC records, including whether any current listing belongs to Rockstar Games or Take-Two Interactive and whether misleadingly similar titles are reviewed or removed.
We have also asked whether Rockstar’s Grand Theft Auto VI has received an Australian classification that cannot currently be identified in the public database. We will update this story if the Branch responds.
Until then, enjoy the strange little window into automated game classification.
Just do not tell Mum the Australian Government rated GTA VI suitable for the kids.
It didn’t.
About the author
The conversation
Comments are closed.