Did Evan Rachel Wood Write The Anonymous Manson Trial Letters?


Evan Rachel Wood emerges as the prime suspect in dispatching two anonymous letters, levelling severe child abuse allegations against her ex, Marilyn Manson.

In a recent development in the ongoing legal battle between Marilyn Manson and Evan Rachel Wood, two anonymous letters were received by the court. The letters, described by the judge as “nearly identical,” have raised eyebrows due to their graphic content and the allegations they contain. The letters suggest that Manson was involved in inappropriate activities with children, a claim that has added a new layer of complexity to an already convoluted case.

RELATED: Aquaman 2 Reshoots Confirmed: Amber Heard Cut?

The letters, which were submitted anonymously, are not considered evidence due to their anonymous nature. In typical circumstances, such letters would be returned to the sender, but in this case, no return addresses were provided, adding to the mystery surrounding their origin. The letters’ intimate knowledge of the case and the judge has led some to speculate that they may have been written by Manson’s ex, Evan Rachel Wood, who has a history of fabricating evidence and making false accusations.

Evan Rachel Wood, a former child actress, has been under FBI investigation for allegedly fabricating a letter from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and submitting it as evidence in a Family Court. This revelation could potentially damage her credibility in the ongoing Manson trial. The letter in question was used to validate a media witch hunt against Manson, who has since filed a lawsuit against Wood for defamation, alleging that she fabricated her stories of abuse.

Marilyn Manson ex-girlfriend says he's a sweetheart
Did Evan Rachel Wood Write The Anonymous Manson Trial Letters?

Wood and artist Illma Gore have been accused of staging a three-year witch hunt against Manson, during which they allegedly conspired to destroy his career and legacy. They are said to have obtained login data for Manson’s Facebook account and used it to search for incriminating evidence and reach out to potential victims. Despite their efforts, the only evidence they have presented is a self-produced documentary and the aforementioned fraudulent FBI document.

In a separate but related matter, Wood recently lost custody of her child, a development she blamed on Manson. However, the child’s father, Jamie Bell, has disputed this claim, stating that it was Wood’s obsession with Manson and the case that led to their separation. Bell has expressed concern about Wood’s mental stability and her ability to care for their child, citing instances where she has emotionally manipulated their child over the Manson case.

Manson case letter
Did Evan Rachel Wood Write The Anonymous Manson Trial Letters?

Bell has also accused Wood of withholding their son from him and expressed concern about the psychological harm she might be inflicting on their child with her talk of abuse and her prolonged separation from him. He has called for the court’s help in bringing their son back home and normalizing the situation.

In addition to these developments, Wood has been criticized for posting pictures of self-harm on the internet, where they were seen by many of her underage fans. She has blamed Manson for her self-harm, further complicating the narrative surrounding their tumultuous relationship.

Evan Rachel Wood SH
Did Evan Rachel Wood Write The Anonymous Manson Trial Letters?

The intrigue surrounding these anonymous letters deepens with the judge’s decision to not admit them into the court record. This move, which effectively rejects the allegations contained within the letters, underscores the court’s commitment to due process and the principle of ‘innocent until proven guilty.’

Furthermore, the judge ordered both the court and records sealed, a step that further isolates these anonymous allegations from the ongoing legal proceedings. This decision not only protects the integrity of the court process but also shields Manson from unfounded accusations that could unduly influence the case. The judge’s refusal to entertain anonymous and unverified claims underscores the importance of evidence-based arguments in the pursuit of justice.

As the case continues to unfold, the truth remains elusive, obscured by a web of allegations, counter-allegations, and a seemingly endless stream of new developments. The arrival of the anonymous letters is just the latest twist in a saga that shows no signs of resolution anytime soon.

- Advertisement -